These provisions implement to cases where evidence was recorded after the QSO's enforcement, even though the transaction occurred just before its promulgation. Read more
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
When the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and progress according to the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
The lots of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is actually made crystal clear that police is free to just take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. When the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-area duties during the interim period. Read more
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In the event the conclusion or finding is such as no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court might interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to really make it acceptable for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-respect the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
With the foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice with the Peace u/s 22-A is not really obliged to afford a possibility of hearing into the accused party; nor obliged to necessarily or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; contract law case book pdf but is required to contemplate all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal legislation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
In federal or multi-jurisdictional law systems there may exist conflicts between the different decrease appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the law is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, along with the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for any dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all performing in their Careers with DCFS.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives on the police would be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and higher than all, assure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other Courts, but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's effectively-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. In case the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then approach the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days for your department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided by the decision in the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have heard the figured out counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession of your subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this facet for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance to your party’s argument, or to guide the present court.